These blogs, opinions, arguments and suggestions can go on. Whether the Supreme Court judgement pertains only to the land of the two respondents mentioned or, as the rest of the judgement discusses, the whole of the 200-odd acres is a moot point. Even if the former is accepted, the Government needs ...

BCCHS and BDA, having registered the sale deeds, collected registration fees and taxes, issued possession certificates, khatas, cannot ask us to return our sites. The court has directed the BCCHS to return certain land to the owners for whatever reason and the BCCHS Public Notice (I hope their lawye...

Happy if the Supreme Court judgement clearly pertains only to the survey numbers mentioned in the BCCHSL newspaper public notice (7/1, 8/1, 49 and 50/2) but can any one show where exactly it says so (page and paragraph number) in the judgement? I have the 36 page judgement. Thanks. Dr. B. Ravindrana...

Agreed. Better than forum, we can form a Society. I am aware that there was one Income Tax Officers' Layout in Sarjapur Road, which also faced vandalism and legal actions. But the over 50 site owners came together, regularized everthing and got 700 flats built. Each of the members got built flats eq...

Thanks, but the judgement leaves the key point (whether it refers only to the 12 acres or all the 208 acres) vague. The original owners claim it is the latter and are breaking down any construction in the area; the police obviously are unwilling to act. The Government, which is also a party to the c...

As is well known, BCCHS (the nearly 100 year old Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society) allotted over 1500 sites in the above layout to its members, issued the registered sale deeds, possession certificates & the BDA issued the Khatas; most of the “owners” have also been paying the taxes regula...